{"id":758,"date":"2014-12-14T12:00:06","date_gmt":"2014-12-14T12:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie?p=758"},"modified":"2014-12-12T12:45:18","modified_gmt":"2014-12-12T12:45:18","slug":"how-does-andrey-zvyaginstevs-leviathan-interpret-social-contract-theory-in-vladimir-putins-russia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/?p=758","title":{"rendered":"How does Andrey Zvyaginstev\u2019s Leviathan interpret social contract theory in Vladimir Putin\u2019s Russia?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-759\" src=\"http:\/\/politicalscience.iewp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/Aonghus-O-Donnchu-93x150.jpg\" alt=\"Aonghus O Donnchu\" width=\"93\" height=\"150\" \/><em>This is the third\u00a0in a series of blogposts on the film 2014 Russian film, Leviathan, written by students in the Politics module, Individuals and the State, who were asked to reflect on the connections between the film and the ideas of Hobbes or other social contract theories.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Aonghus \u00d3 Donnch\u00fa writes:<\/p>\n<p>Andrey Zvyaginstev\u2019s <em>Leviathan<\/em> (2014) depicts a brutish example of Hobbesian social contract theory in which Locke\u2019s views are forced aside; in the words of <em>Observer<\/em> film critic Mark Kermode it \u2018is a tale of big themes and little people\u2019. \u00a0The protagonist, Kolya, battles alongside his old friend Dmitri for his supposed Lockean right to property which Dmitri claims is enshrined in Russian law. \u00a0This falls short of the actuality of the situation whereby the local mayor, Vadim, fights for his right to take Kolya\u2019s property. \u00a0This reflects a Hobbesian state of affairs in which man sacrifices his rights in return for the protection of the state.<\/p>\n<p>The film reflects the Hobbesian nature of Russia\u2019s social contract very well. \u00a0Hobbes sees the social contract as a safeguard against the anarchy of the state of nature he describes. \u00a0This anarchy can be seen simmering under the surface from beginning to end with hatred growing, violence and betrayal between friends and corruption within the authorities as every man looks after himself. \u00a0Ironically it is the crooked government of Vadim that stops this anarchy from coming to a boil. \u00a0The fact that the movie frequently alludes to Russia\u2019s wider power structures, Vadim often referencing power brokers in Moscow, the picture of Putin in his office and even the shooting of portraits of previous Russian and Soviet leaders at a birthday get-together, proves that this outlook on the social contract is not just in play in this town, but across Russia as a whole. \u00a0This, however, does not mean that this rural, seaside town under Vadim\u2019s control lives under a peaceful social contract whereby the people make sacrifices and in return Vadim protects them.<\/p>\n<p>A key motif of<em> Leviathan<\/em>, clearly tangible throughout, is the failure of Russia\u2019s social contract under current leader Vladimir Putin, whose portrait hangs centrally in the corrupt Vadim\u2019s office. None of the protection the state owes its individuals is provided to the main characters in this film. \u00a0This is palpable in Dmitri\u2019s beating to the brink of death at the hands of Vadim\u2019s bodyguards, Lilya\u2019s suicide and Kolya\u2019s biased trial which judges the innocent man guilty. \u00a0However, there is no starker case of Government failure to uphold the social contract than the case of Kolya\u2019s son Roma, who is left alone for roughly five days after the arrest of his father, and after that is saved by his father\u2019s accusers rather than be left to the implied misery of state care. \u00a0Failure to adequately care for the weakest in society, children under eighteen years of age, is a clear depiction of Vadim\u2019s, and through him, Putin\u2019s, failure to uphold the totalitarian Hobbesian contract that appears to be favourable to the corrupt mayor Vadim.<\/p>\n<p>Hobbes acknowledged that the state of war as depicted before the social contract came to exist does, after its creation, become existent on a higher level as those in power have no sovereign powers to bow down to. \u00a0A microcosm of this can be seen in <em>Leviathan<\/em> in Vadim\u2019s leadership. \u00a0There is of course a higher power here, in the form of the Moscow power base, but they seem disinterested for the most part provided Vadim proves to be no trouble for them. \u00a0The only other power that can be expected to outweigh that of Vadim is that of God and the Russian Orthodox Church, a strong recurring organisation in the film. \u00a0Vadim clearly respects the power of the Church with frequent visits to priests in the church; however the church is constantly committed to Vadim. \u00a0Its unwavering support grants him heavenly support to do as he wishes. \u00a0Of course the favour is returned when Vadim builds a church on Kolya\u2019s land. \u00a0This is clearly seen to be no more than a power grab by Vadim, however, at the end when the poor majority are barely visible in the midst of the power players driving expensive cars to this church. \u00a0Not even the church was above Vadim. \u00a0Once he was granted the power of the social contract the world became his in his eyes.<\/p>\n<p>The view of the social contract portrayed in <em>Leviathan<\/em> would be a horror to the civil rights based contracts of Locke or Rousseau, however it is too similar to Hobbes\u2019, whose book of course shares the film\u2019s title, to dismiss. \u00a0Even this version of the social contract is visibly coming apart at the seams, but a strong ruler remains who does, for the most part, provide protection, if rather limited, in return for the loss of certain rights.<\/p>\n<p>Kermode, M. (2014) \u2018Leviathan review \u2013 Andrew Zvyaginstev\u2019s outstanding tale of the epic and the everyday.\u2019 \u00a0<em>Guardian <\/em>available from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/film\/2014\/nov\/09\/leviathan-review-andrey-zvyagintsev-epic-everyday%20\">http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/film\/2014\/nov\/09\/leviathan-review-andrey-zvyagintsev-epic-everyday<\/a> [last accessed on 24 November 2014]<\/p>\n<p><em>I am a 2<sup>nd<\/sup> year history, politics and international relations student in UCD. \u00a0I was born and raised in Ballyboden in South Dublin. \u00a0In politics my main interest would be international relations, while in history I prefer military history. \u00a0Thankfully there is quite a lot of overlap between these two fields of research. \u00a0I hope to continue studying history after my degree and attain a masters<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is the third\u00a0in a series of blogposts on the film 2014 Russian film, Leviathan, written by students in the Politics module, Individuals and the State, who were asked to reflect on the connections between the film and the ideas &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/?p=758\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=758"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/758\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":760,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/758\/revisions\/760"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}