{"id":1119,"date":"2018-04-05T10:28:50","date_gmt":"2018-04-05T10:28:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/?p=1119"},"modified":"2018-04-05T10:30:52","modified_gmt":"2018-04-05T10:30:52","slug":"american-innocence-and-the-ethics-of-patriotism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/?p=1119","title":{"rendered":"American Innocence and the Ethics of Patriotism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>by Prof Roberto Sirvent<\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019re a player in the United States\u2019 National Football League (NFL) and you\u2019ve decided to kneel during the playing of the National Anthem, you have been called many things: unpatriotic, ungrateful, and even a \u201cson of a bitch.\u201d That these words came from the sitting U.S. President Donald Trump should come as no surprise. Having made a promise to \u201cMake American Great Again,\u201d Trump has forced philosophers to rethink commonly held notions of American patriotism.<\/p>\n<p>In this talk, Roberto Sirvent argues that interrogating the ethics of patriotism requires much more than condemning it as a philosophical mistake. Rather, he shows that a critique of patriotism (in the U.S. context) must involve a critique of ideologies that undergird and fuel patriotic attitudes. Two of these ideologies, he argues, are American exceptionalism and American innocence. These twin ideologies inform not just political rhetoric but historical memory as well.<\/p>\n<p>Both conservatives <em>and<\/em> liberals draw on these narratives of innocence and exceptionalism constantly. It\u2019s present in Donald Trump\u2019s call to \u201cMake America Great Again\u201d but also in Hillary Clinton\u2019s rebuttal that \u201cwe don\u2019t need to make America great again. America never stopped being great.\u201d \u00a0The mainstream, corporate media are also active propagandists for American exceptionalism and innocence. For example, in a <em>New York Times<\/em> editorial, the staff acknowledges the \u201cmistakes\u201d of US foreign policy yet reaffirms its exceptional character: \u201cThere\u2019s no doubt that the United States has made terrible mistakes, like invading Iraq in 2003 and torturing terrorism suspects after Sept. 11 [but]\u2026 in recent decades, American presidents who took military action have been driven by the desire to promote freedom and democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>How is it that the U.S. invasion of Iraq is seen as a mere \u201cmistake\u201d? How did the entire editorial board of the New York Times become convinced that the U.S. military enters wars \u201cto promote freedom and democracy?\u201d How does one maintain belief in the U.S. as a force for good in the world in light of the genocide of its indigenous people, slavery, and decades of imperialism around the globe? What ideological work is involved to view these actions as mere \u201cmistakes\u201d, \u201caberrations\u201d, \u201cnecessary evils\u201d, or even \u201cthings of the past,\u201d rather than as <em>constitutive <\/em>of the U.S. State itself?<\/p>\n<p>Throughout the talk, Sirvent explores how ideologies of American exceptionalism and American innocence are tied to the way many people in the U.S. venerate the military, flag, law, and Constitution. Thus, not only is a critique of <em>ideology <\/em>required to properly philosophize about the ethics of patriotism; a critique of <em>idolatry <\/em>is required as well. To be sure, there is much at stake in debates about patriotism, especially since the stories we tell ourselves \u2013 whether it\u2019s about slavery, genocide, colonialism, or empire \u2013 have significant implications in struggles for social justice. After all, if the system is broken, then it needs to be fixed (or reformed). But if the system <em>is working exactly as it\u2019s supposed to be<\/em>, then it needs to be dismantled. And it\u2019s time to start imagining what a new world might look like.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Roberto-Pic-for-UCD-002.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-1120 size-thumbnail alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Roberto-Pic-for-UCD-002-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Roberto-Pic-for-UCD-002-150x150.jpg 150w, http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/Roberto-Pic-for-UCD-002-200x198.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a>Roberto Sirvent is Professor of Political and Social Ethics, Hope International University, Fullerton, CA. This blog is written in advance of his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucd.ie\/spire\/newsandevents\/dublinpoliticaltheoryworkshop\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dublin Political Theory Workshop<\/a> on\u00a0Friday, 6. April 2018, 13:15-14:15, in G316 Newman Building.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Prof Roberto Sirvent If you\u2019re a player in the United States\u2019 National Football League (NFL) and you\u2019ve decided to kneel during the playing of the National Anthem, you have been called many things: unpatriotic, ungrateful, and even a \u201cson &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/?p=1119\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[151],"tags":[143,184,185],"class_list":["post-1119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dublin-political-theory-workshop","tag-donald-trump","tag-patriotism","tag-united-states"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1119"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1124,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119\/revisions\/1124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/politicalscience.ie\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}